Law of Trust

---

JURISDICTION:

M.N.R.P. is the “Trustee” for all Nationals and Citizens, who have sworn their allegiance and to obey the Constitutional Laws and Public Laws of M.N.R.P. 

Real Property is Controlled by the laws of the Jurisdiction in which it lies. The validity of the purpose of trust of real property is, in accordance with this principle, determined by the law of situs. M.N.R.P. has personal matter and subject matter jurisdiction over all Nationals, Citizens and their property. Jurisdiction is power to declare the law! Capron v. Van Noordenm 6 US 126, 2 Cranch 126(1804)

M.N.R.P. is a Society of people inhabiting a defined territory and organized under an independent government; a Sovereign Political State.

So by being in a Private Trust the statute and codes of the United State, Union States,  several states, or Foreign States does not apply to the real property of the Trust.

8 USC 1101 (a)(14) The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states. 

The corpus(body) of the trust is both real and personal property and including the Beneficiaries and Trustees as well. All are immune from Taxation, tariffs, customs, statutes and codes of United States, Union States, several States, or any Foreign States.  

In Berry v. McCourt. 204 N.E. 2d 235, 240 (1965) the  court held that the Express Trust is a “contractual relationship based on trust form”; and  in Smith v. Morse. 2 Cal. 524, it was held that any law or procedure in its operation  denying or obstructing contract rights impairs the contractual obligation and is, therefore,  violative of Article 1 Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution. Because the Express Trust is  created by the exercise of the natural right to contract, which cannot be abridged, the  agreement, when executed, becomes protected under federally enforceable right of  contract law and not under laws passed by any of the several state legislatures.

In Eliot v. Freeman 220 U.S. 178 (1911), the court made it clear that the Express Trust is  not subject legislative control. It went further to acknowledge the right-wise stance of the  United States Supreme Court that the trust relationship comes under the realm of equity,  based upon the common-law right of contract, and is not subject to legislative restrictions  as are corporations and other organizations created by legislative authority. To clarity the  equity and common-law distinctions, the basis for Express Trusts under the common law  in this instance, is not that such organizations are creatures of common law, as  distinguished from equity, but that they are created under the common law of contracts  and do not depend upon statute.